An open letter to muslims.

Dear Muslims,

If you think just by voting for congress you will have a better life standards with your children getting better education and livelihood, you are wrong. If you think Congress is so called "secular" and "non-hindutwa" and you will have some advantages due to it, then you are wrong.

You will get nothing more than a handful of corrupt politicians and criminals, who do not wish to develop neither the country nor you. Stop Feeding these corrupt politicians.

IN 60 years, they have always said that they are with minorities, is your condition any better? Nor is of the majority.

There is no problem if you select a hindu candidate who believes in development. Let India shine.

If you hate someone, don't vote for him. But while voting keep in mind the promises that had been made to you from the past 60 years and never been fulfilled. 

We majority have this advantages upon you that we are not fed with false promises.

Anti-political Guy.

YOUNG INDIA

I wish if the GANDHI family could think much above the “GANDHIAN DYNASTY” of their own.  They have thought of it that they will rule the country much like in a dynastical way. Being a blogger I think a lot of times that is it really worth to let people know about the unlike politics which in actual is heading towards a “monarchy system”.  What did PRIYANKA VADRA wanted to show by bringing her kids on podium during the Raibarely election campaign. Was that a signal for the people of India that “look people, this is your future. Right now us and later they will be ruling you”. And what often Sonia Gandhi wants to show us by making his failure son the vice president of congress party. A man who has shortage of attendance in parliament, whose degrees are coming under questions, who has proved himself as a “disable” administrator. MRS.GANDHI thoughts are crystal clear. This family has made a perception about this country that this is their patent and they are born to rule this country. At present the monarchy system format has just changed in India.

The so-called “yuvraj” has just been a poster boy till now. Whenever the country is in any problem he is often busy in some “secret” work of his. You won’t find him ever at a right place and at a right time. He simply vanishes and such an irresponsible man is being portrayed as our country’s future “prime mininter” candidate. Just by eating in a dalit woman’s house and spending some time with them won’t bring prosperity in our country. This is not what his fore said “YOUNG INDIA” wants. It wants a prosper country whose people don’t ever die because of starvation. It wants a country where no man commits suicide because of his financial crisis. It too wants a country where no youngster commits suicide because of unemployment. Let’s get real MR.GANDHI!!!!!! These are the actual things what Young India wants and sadly you are proving incapable of giving these things to this Young India. I might be sounding a bit rude but it really pisses me off at times when such incapable people talk about our country’s growth and development who might even not know that how many people reside in his constituency. Just by wearing a white kurta-payjama won’t make you this country’s leader. Learn how to stand for people at times of crisis and learn how to help them practically at their hard times. Then only you can question others about their work. 

"THE DEVELOPMENT CHARIOT"

Our country needs a good human being who also has practical ideas on how to bring progress and political change for our country. The entire country is witnessing  NAMO’S and RAHUL GANDHI’s battle for the “ upcoming power”. But I m worried that we have finally reached to this. We have one person who refuses to answer any question on the blood on his hands as Chief Minister and another who is being projected as a mature philosopher when we actually need a dynamic leader. Bill gates once quoted  “Go to Gujarat and see the transformation, development, bridges, roads, IT companies, the speed of decision making and you will realize why he is the right person for us.” What is wrong if a developer wants to take the development chariot throughout the entire country. While on the other hand  Someone needs to tell Rahul Gandhi that he is not a philosopher and India doesn’t need one in him! We need a strong leader who has a genuine thinking for our country’s development.  and NAMO's development chariot can go through the entire circle of development in our country. We don’t want the ones who with the “mask” of secularism are residing traitors in our country. Secularism has now got a new definition by some eminent leaders of our country. But this concept will not give an Indian the feeling of security. No Indian today feels secure in this country. All thanks to MR.PHILOSOPHER’s philosophy of being human and let harmful catalyst reside in our country. And if in answer to it other opposition  leader feel that our country should rise above this humanity concept and start thinking for our economic and educational benefit  then according to any genuine person there  is nothing wrong in it. So people please stop accusing a genuine person for his past and have a look on the present which is much more horrified than the past. 

" NAMO"

There are several people who are describing NAMO as an impeccable secular minister and those who don’t see him in that way  must  go through the Indian constitution “SECULAR” description once more. He is being seen by people as an honest and thoroughly administrative leader. He posses quality of a complete secular leader. If we pay attention towards some eminent BJP leaders statement then according to them “HINDUTVA” in itself is secular in nature.

The SHIV SENA which is now lamming MODI for his “GUJRATIS ONLY” act , has earlier described him as “pseudo secular”. Even a non-secular party like the SHIV SENA recognizes the crying need of BJP leaders to be seen as , ahem, “SECULAR” how so ever they may define it. but that can happen only when MODI offers  along with the KEDARNATH temple, to rebuild the BABRI MASJID in Ayodhya.  

With the appointment of NAMO as the parliamentary poll panel chief of the bjp, which leads the NDA  comments like “RAM MANDIR is in our agenda” worries many people and creates a fear. Some leaders cal him impeccably secular and some leaders are breaking their alliance with NDA just because of the wholesome presence of this leader in the NDA alliance. So the portrayal of NAMO as a “SECULAR” LEADER is getting messed up due to several  unlikely comments on him. But facts speak more than the comments.

HINDUTVA vs SECULARISM

Politics in India may not be the same aagain , as BJP is moving away from secularism and getting close towards HINDUTVA. Secularism has been the corner stone of the structure that India has tried to raise since independence. It has not been an ideal effort , Yet it has kept the country together, with no recurring example of communal divide.

 The Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP)  has introduced pure communalism to the soft Hindutava that prevailed so far. By appointing the hardliner Narendra Modi, Gujarat Chief Minister, the panel chief for the 2014 parliament election, the party has dropped every bit of ambiguity over secularism. It is stark Hinduism for all to see.

 The repercussions of such a person at the helm of BJP, not possessing even a semblance of liberalism, can be dangerous. Obsessed with driving a wedge between Hindus and Muslims, he can vitiate the young mind. Liberalism or idealism already receding to the background, bigotism and extremism will go to allocate what is left of the composite culture. The BJP has purveyed the impression that it is looking for a space that will give it an image of being  pro-Hindu but not extremist. Modi will stop such an ideology developing. Modi’s image of parochialism will make the idea of India jeopardized  The country will be unsettling when it is settling down to an ideology which may not be purely secular. 

Calculative Politics

The impending exit of Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal (United) from the BJP-led NDA is the best thing that could have happened to both the parties – and the polity. And the only and best Reason is that  alliances should be based on fundamental principles and similarity of views, not mere electoral math or convenience. The breakdown of the 17 year old alliance between the Bharatiya Janata Party and Janata Dal United seems to be imminent. There is a huge difference between an alliance and a power sharing sort of agreement. An alliance is supposed to share some core ideas and similar principles. And a power sharing agreement is about compromising principles and ideals to gain power. So its crystal clear  in that sense that neither NDA nor UPA is an alliance. They are pre or post-election power sharing arrangements. This  is why the so called demise of the NDA is not a bad thing. At the core of the NDA alliance are just three parties: BJP , Akali Dal and Shiv Sena. All three share the basic idea that religious identity is important to their politics. The rest of the NDA is often reconstructed only after the election which shows who has what numbers to culminate in a power sharing arrangement.

 So why to make a calculative process such a thinkable issue. It happens and will keep on happening every time there will be a power sharing agreement.

ADVANI "UNCONVENTIONAL"

“It was Syama Prasad Mookerjee who brought Orissa Gantantra Parishad leaders to his party's first national convention in Kanpur. This reflected his willingness to join ranks with other parties to break the hegemony of the Congress. This was a message to befriend anti-Congress parties”..  Advani’s this statement reflects his willingness to unite the  NDA  ALLIANCES together. He gave this veiled reference on the JD(U)'s exit from the NDA over Narendra Modi's elevation as chief campaigner. Advani recounting his association with MOOKERJI spoke much more than he himself said. It seems that his remembrance for  MOOKERJI and his ideology was a way again to make the party leaders remind that for him BJP still was no more  the "same idealistic party" that Mookerjee had created. May be Advani thinks that after taking back his resignation , people will see all the things in the same old way, but his own “unconventional” statements makes the "AWAAM" rethink on his thoughts.